Aristotle: IMO-level Automated Theorem Proving · HackerPapers discussions

Aristotle: IMO-level Automated Theorem Proving — mentioned by RGamma

Tue, 13 Jan 2026 22:33:52 GMT

This is part of the work that lead to Aristotle, the system that performed at Gold level at IMO: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.01346

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Aristotle: IMO-level Automated Theorem Proving — mentioned by D-Machine

Fri, 09 Jan 2026 23:46:20 GMT

Did you not read the parts where Aristotle (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.01346) was an integral component of all this?

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Aristotle: IMO-level Automated Theorem Proving — mentioned by D-Machine

Fri, 09 Jan 2026 23:45:42 GMT

It could not be done without Aristotle (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.01346), as clearly described in Tao's posts.

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Aristotle: IMO-level Automated Theorem Proving — mentioned by D-Machine

Fri, 09 Jan 2026 23:45:18 GMT

It could not be done without Aristotle (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.01346), did you even read the links?

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Aristotle: IMO-level Automated Theorem Proving — mentioned by D-Machine

Fri, 09 Jan 2026 23:30:34 GMT

This is great, there is still so much potential in AI once we move beyond LLMs to specialized approaches like this. EDIT: Look at all the people below just reacting to the headline and clearly not reading the posts. Aristotle (https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.01346) is key here folks. EDIT2: It is clear much of the people below don't even understand basic terminology. Something being a transformer doesn't make it an LLM (vision transformers, anyone) and if you aren't training on language (e.g. AlphaFold, or Aristotle on LEAN stuff), it isn't a "language" model.

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Aristotle: IMO-level Automated Theorem Proving — HN submission

Fri, 03 Oct 2025 17:05:46 GMT

Aristotle: IMO-Level Automated Theorem Proving

3 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.