<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A Comprehensive FP8 Training Recipe for Reasoning-Enhanced Language Models · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2509.22536/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2509.22536/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A Comprehensive FP8 Training Recipe for Reasoning-Enhanced Language Models — mentioned by ricardobeat</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46187526</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2509.22536:46187526</guid><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 02:09:59 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the reported hallucinations in this work [1], starting with David Rein, says the other authors are entirely made up. They are indeed absent from the original cited paper [2], but a Google search shows some of the same names featured in citations from other papers [3] [4]. Most of the names in these wrong attributions are actual people though, not hallucinations. What is going on? Is this a case of AI-powered citation management creating some weird feedback loop? [1] https://app.gptzero.me/documents/54c8aa45-c97d-48fc-b9d0-d49... [2] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.12022 [3]…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2509.22536/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
