HackerPapers

arXiv:2509.16749cs.CR

Evaluating LLM Generated Detection Rules in Cybersecurity

Anna Bertiger, Bobby Filar, Aryan Luthra, Stefano Meschiari, Aiden Mitchell, Sam Scholten, Vivek Sharath

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

LLMs are increasingly pervasive in the security environment, with limited measures of their effectiveness, which limits trust and usefulness to security practitioners. Here, we present an open-source evaluation framework and benchmark metrics for evaluating LLM-generated cybersecurity rules. The benchmark employs a holdout set-based methodology to measure the effectiveness of LLM-generated security rules in comparison to a human-generated corpus of rules. It provides three key metrics inspired by the way experts evaluate security rules, offering a realistic, multifaceted evaluation of the effectiveness of an LLM-based security rule generator. This methodology is illustrated using rules from Sublime Security's detection team and those written by Sublime Security's Automated Detection Engineer (ADE), with a thorough analysis of ADE's skills presented in the results section.

arXiv comments
Preprint of a paper accepted at the Conference on Applied Machine Learning in Information Security (CAMLIS 2025). 11 pages, 3 figures, 4 tables
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CRCryptography and Security cs.AIArtificial Intelligence

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 2 HN submissions from Oct 2025 to Oct 2025. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.