<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Compute as Teacher: Turning Inference Compute Into Reference-Free Supervision · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2509.14234/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2509.14234/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Compute as Teacher: Turning Inference Compute Into Reference-Free Supervision — mentioned by NitpickLawyer</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45291226</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2509.14234:45291226</guid><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 15:55:35 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Paper link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.14234 Some interesting tidbits. - they propose several &amp;quot;judges&amp;quot;, each with their own model (weights at different stages) and separate &amp;quot;concerns&amp;quot;. The generate part evolves with the model (in RL) while the &amp;quot;gather and reconcile&amp;quot; is fixed at a frozen stage. - the &amp;quot;gather and reconcile&amp;quot; judge doesn&amp;#x27;t get the question when analysing the entire rollout set! (I hope I read this correctly &amp;quot;We keep the anchor question-blind to prevent it from acting as just another rollout and to encourage genuine cross-rollout reasoning&amp;quot;) - a 2nd judge &amp;quot;marks&amp;quot; binary yes/no…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2509.14234/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
