HackerPapers

arXiv:2509.07999q-bio.NC

The Computational Foundations of Collective Intelligence

Charlie Pilgrim, Joe Morford, Elizabeth Warren, Mélisande Aellen, Christopher Krupenye, Richard P Mann, Dora Biro

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Why do collectives outperform individuals when solving some problems? Fundamentally, collectives have greater computational resources with more sensory information, more memory, more processing capacity, and more ways to act. While greater resources present opportunities, there are also challenges in coordination and cooperation inherent in collectives with distributed, modular structures. Despite these challenges, we show how collective resource advantages lead directly to well-known forms of collective intelligence including the wisdom of the crowd, collective sensing, division of labour, and cultural learning. Our framework also generates testable predictions about collective capabilities in distributed reasoning and context-dependent behavioural switching. Through case studies of animal navigation and decision-making, we demonstrate how collectives leverage their computational resources to solve problems not only more effectively than individuals, but by using qualitatively different problem-solving strategies.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
q-bio.NCNeurons and Cognition cs.AIArtificial Intelligence cs.MAMultiagent Systems cs.NENeural and Evolutionary Computing nlin.AOAdaptation and Self-Organizing Systems physics.soc-phPhysics and Society

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from Sep 2025 to Sep 2025. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.