https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2509.06160/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45234790urn:hackerpapers:submission:2509.06160:45234790Sat, 13 Sep 2025 19:49:08 GMT<p>Reverse-Engineered Reasoning for Open-Ended Generation</p><p></p><p>4 points; 1 discussion reply on HN. <a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2509.06160/">Paper and source history</a>. A submission is not an endorsement.</p>cs.AIhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45184327urn:hackerpapers:mention:2509.06160:45184327Tue, 09 Sep 2025 16:25:03 GMT<p>Seems interesting to let the LLMs design their own reasoning traces instead of being constrained by human labelers. I could imagine some self consistency approaches to find common high-quality reasoning traces. Seems like a bitter lesson moment for reasoning traces. PDF of the Paper - https://arxiv.org/pdf/2509.06160</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2509.06160/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>cs.AIhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45184326urn:hackerpapers:submission:2509.06160:45184326Tue, 09 Sep 2025 16:25:03 GMT<p>Reasoning Traces from QA Pairs</p><p></p><p>3 points; 1 discussion reply on HN. <a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2509.06160/">Paper and source history</a>. A submission is not an endorsement.</p>cs.AI