<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Telephone Game: Evaluating Semantic Drift in Unified Models · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2509.04438/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2509.04438/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Telephone Game: Evaluating Semantic Drift in Unified Models — mentioned by pravj</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45332062</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2509.04438:45332062</guid><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 11:44:57 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This resonates a lot with some observations I drafted last week about &amp;quot;AI Slop&amp;quot; at the workplace. Overall, people are making a net-negative contribution by not having a sense of when to review/filter the responses generated by AI tools, because either (i) someone else is required to make that additional effort, or (ii) the problem is not solved properly. This sounds similar to a few patterns I noted - The average length of documents and emails has increased. - Not alarmingly so, but people have started writing Slack/Teams responses with LLMs. (and it’s not just to fix the grammar.) - Many…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2509.04438/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
