HackerPapers

arXiv:2508.20425cs.AR

The Future of Memory: Limits and Opportunities

Samuel Dayo, Shuhan Liu, Peijing Li, Philip Levis, Subhasish Mitra, Thierry Tambe, David Tennenhouse, H. -S. Philip Wong

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Memory latency, bandwidth, capacity, and energy increasingly limit performance. In this paper, we reconsider proposed system architectures that consist of huge (many-terabyte to petabyte scale) memories shared among large numbers of CPUs. We argue two practical engineering challenges, scaling and signaling, limit such designs. We propose the opposite approach. Rather than create large, shared, homogenous memories, systems explicitly break memory up into smaller slices more tightly coupled with compute elements. Leveraging advances in 2.5D/3D integration, this compute-memory node provisions private local memory, enabling accesses of node-exclusive data through micrometer-scale distances, and dramatically reduced access cost. In-package memory elements support shared state within a processor, providing far better bandwidth and energy-efficiency than DRAM, which is used as main memory for large working sets and cold data. Hardware making memory capacities and distances explicit allows software to efficiently compose this hierarchy, managing data placement and movement.

arXiv comments
3 Pages, 2 Figures, 1 Table, Accepted to SOSP 25 BigMem Workshop
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.ARHardware Architecture

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from Sep 2025 to Sep 2025. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.