<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Is RISC-V ready for High Performance Computing? An evaluation of the Sophon SG2044 · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2508.13840/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2508.13840/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Is RISC-V ready for High Performance Computing? An evaluation of the Sophon SG2044 — mentioned by inkyoto</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48904924</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2508.13840:48904924</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 11:07:51 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Performance gap is not closing in specimens commercially available today, and the promises of it «happening any moment from now» are now indistinguishable from monthly horoscopes. For example, Zen 2 is a 2019 design, and the 64-core SG2044 C920v2, which was released in May 2025, a three-decode, four-dispatch core at about 2.6 GHz, with 128-bit vectors is still approximately[0]: – 9 times slower in the block tridiagonal solver at 64 cores; – 2.05 times slower in the lower-upper Gauss-Seidel solver; – 2.05 times slower in the scalar pentadiagonal solver. Given a six year gap between two design…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2508.13840/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DC</category></item></channel></rss>
