<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A Quantum Analogue of the Pfaffian-Determinant Identity, An Algebraic and Geometric Study in the q-Skew-Symmetric Case · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2508.11634/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2508.11634/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A Quantum Analogue of the Pfaffian-Determinant Identity, An Algebraic and Geometric Study in the q-Skew-Symmetric Case — mentioned by generationP</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45783847</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2508.11634:45783847</guid><pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2025 18:05:49 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I have a hunch that most of the slop is not just on CS but specifically about AI. For some reason, a lot of people&amp;#x27;s first idea when they encounter an LLM is &amp;quot;let&amp;#x27;s have this LLM write an opinion piece about LLMs&amp;quot;, as if they want to test its self-awareness or hack it by self-recursion. And then they get a medley of the learning data, which if they are lucky contains some technical explanations sprinkled in. That said, AI-generated papers have already been spotted in other disciplines besides cs, and some of them are really obvious (arXiv:2508.11634v1 starts with a review of a non-existing…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2508.11634/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.QA</category></item></channel></rss>
