<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Estimating Worst-Case Frontier Risks of Open-Weight LLMs · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2508.03153/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2508.03153/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Estimating Worst-Case Frontier Risks of Open-Weight LLMs — mentioned by xpe</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47267433</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2508.03153:47267433</guid><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 21:19:06 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; I&amp;#x27;m just curious what the most unhinged response to this might be. Are you asking how dangerous open-weight models are? You could start with: Ryan Greenblatt on the AI Alignment Forum : &amp;quot;When is it important that open-weight models aren&amp;#x27;t released?&amp;quot; https://www.alignmentforum.org/posts/TeF8Az2EiWenR9APF/when-... From the Centre for Future Generations : &amp;quot;Can open-weight models ever be safe?&amp;quot; https://cfg.eu/can-open-weight-models-ever-be-safe/ From OpenAI authors, far from neutral : &amp;quot;Estimating Worst-Case Frontier Risks of Open-Weight LLMs&amp;quot; https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.03153&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2508.03153/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
