<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A comprehensive taxonomy of hallucinations in Large Language Models · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2508.01781/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2508.01781/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A comprehensive taxonomy of hallucinations in Large Language Models — mentioned by godelski</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44841232</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2508.01781:44841232</guid><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2025 20:16:33 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m actually curious about how you both come to those definitions of hallucinations. It gets very difficult to distinguish these things when you dig into them. Simon dropped this paper[0] in another thread[1] and while they provide a formal mathematical definition I don&amp;#x27;t think this makes it clear (I mean it is one person (who doesn&amp;#x27;t have a long publication record, PhD, or work at a university), but following their definition is still a bit muddy. They say the truth has to be in the training but don&amp;#x27;t clarify if they mean in training distribution or literal training example. To make a clear…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2508.01781/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>A comprehensive taxonomy of hallucinations in Large Language Models — mentioned by simonw</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44831621</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2508.01781:44831621</guid><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 23:22:32 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;My personal definition of hallucination (which I thought was widespread) is when a model states a fact about the world that is entirely made up - &amp;quot;the James Webb telescope took the first photograph of an exoplanet&amp;quot; for example. I just got pointed to this new paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.01781 - &amp;quot;A comprehensive taxonomy of hallucinations in Large Language Models&amp;quot; - which has a definition in the introduction which matches my mental model: &amp;quot;This phenomenon describes the generation of content that, while often plausible and coherent, is factually incorrect, inconsistent, or entirely…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2508.01781/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
