<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Prompting Science Report 3: I'll pay you or I'll kill you -- but will you care? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2508.00614/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2508.00614/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Prompting Science Report 3: I'll pay you or I'll kill you -- but will you care? — mentioned by cdrini</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45083934</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2508.00614:45083934</guid><pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2025 15:28:26 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The best research I&amp;#x27;ve seen on this is: - Threatening or tipping a model generally has no significant effect on benchmark performance. - Prompt variations can significantly affect performance on a per-question level. However, it is hard to know in advance whether a particular prompting approach will help or harm the LLM&amp;#x27;s ability to answer any particular question. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.00614&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2508.00614/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
