HackerPapers

arXiv:2507.21402astro-ph.EP

Intercepting 3I/ATLAS at Closest Approach to Jupiter with the Juno spacecraft

Abraham Loeb, Adam Hibberd, Adam Crowl

Abstract

The interstellar object 3I/ATLAS is expected to arrive at a distance of $53.56(\pm 0.45)$ million ${\rm km}$ ($0.358\pm 0.003$~au) from Jupiter on March 16, 2026. We show that applying a total thrust $Δ$V of $2.6755 {\rm km~s^{-1}}$ to lower perijove on September 9, 2025 and then execute a Jupiter Oberth Maneuver, can bring the Juno spacecraft from its orbit around Jupiter to intercept the path of 3I/ATLAS on March 14, 2026. We further show that it is possible for Juno to come much closer to 3I/ATLAS ($\sim{27}$ million km) with 110 kg of remaining propellant, merely 5.4% of the initial fuel reservoir. We find that for low available $Δ$V there is no particular benefit in application of a double impulse (for example to reach $\sim{27}$ million km from 3I/ATLAS), however if Juno has a higher $Δ$V capability there is significant advantage to a second impulse with typically a saving of propellant by a factor of a half. A close fly-by might be able to probe the nature of 3I/ATLAS far better than telescopes on Earth.

arXiv comments
Published in Aerospace, 2025, 12, 851
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
astro-ph.EPEarth and Planetary Astrophysics astro-ph.GAAstrophysics of Galaxies astro-ph.IMInstrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics

On Hacker News

Linked by 2 identifiable commenters in 2 comments across 2 threads, from Aug 2025 to Aug 2025. Found in 1 HN submission from Aug 2025 to Aug 2025. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • You can read their paper here[0]. I agree it's very dodgy (and without even looking at that author's past). While the comet 3I/ATLAS approaches within 53 million km of Jupiter (0.3 au), all they can propose is, optimistically, to bring Juno to within half that distance–27…

      perihelionsView on HNParent context

    • Yes he did so: Poorly. His idea [0] to use Juno is a pretty bad one, given that it doesn't have the fuel to do what he suggests, and even if it did, one of its engines was damaged during a recent maneuver. And, at least according to Jason Wright, Loeb should have known all this…

      827aView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.