<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>SETOL: A Semi-Empirical Theory of (Deep) Learning · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2507.17912/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2507.17912/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>SETOL: A Semi-Empirical Theory of (Deep) Learning — mentioned by riemannzeta</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46888513</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2507.17912:46888513</guid><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 17:15:35 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Neat result. The symmetry exploitation here reminds me of recent work connecting neural network training dynamics to renormalization group theory. Charles Martin&amp;#x27;s SETOL paper https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.17912 shows that well-trained layers converge to something like an RG fixed point—the eigenvalue spectrum of the weight matrix develops power-law tails with exponent α ≈ 2, which is the signature of scale invariance. At this fixed point, the &amp;quot;effective correlation space&amp;quot; is low-dimensional: you can truncate the SVD aggressively and recover nearly identical test accuracy. I wonder if there&amp;#x27;s a…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2507.17912/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>SETOL: A Semi-Empirical Theory of (Deep) Learning — mentioned by riemannzeta</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46879194</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2507.17912:46879194</guid><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 23:51:50 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Not an expert in neurobiology, but... heck this is Hacker News: Let&amp;#x27;s assume that the brain implements a renormalization group flow in a way similar to transformers, as described here: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.17912 In biological neural networks, synaptic weight distributions presumably have some effective α. Learning perturbs α away from optimal — overfitting would correspond to α drifting toward values that capture training noise rather than generalizable structure. The question becomes: what mechanism pushes α back toward 2? Astrocytes are positioned to do exactly this. They don&amp;#x27;t modify…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2507.17912/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>SETOL: A Semi-Empirical Theory of (Deep) Learning — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44684301</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2507.17912:44684301</guid><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 15:31:56 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Setol: SemiEmpirical Theory of (Deep) Learning&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;6 points; 3 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2507.17912/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
