<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Spectroscopic Characterization of Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS: Water Ice in the Coma · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2507.14916/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2507.14916/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Spectroscopic Characterization of Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS: Water Ice in the Coma — mentioned by 827a</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44794386</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2507.14916:44794386</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 04:35:39 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, so as part of your concern that it shouldn&amp;#x27;t be &amp;quot;improper&amp;quot; to think about, discuss, or enjoy Loeb&amp;#x27;s ideas, you suggest that the author of that video should &amp;quot;feel bad&amp;quot; about criticizing it? Nice, that&amp;#x27;s really cool of you. Loeb is allowed to enjoy the ideas of it being an alien spaceship about to Dark Forest us, but no one is allowed to push back against it. There&amp;#x27;s no such thing as a &amp;quot;dispute&amp;quot; about what ideas are proper to discuss and enjoy. There might be a dispute concerning leveraging Harvard credentials and a Harvard domain name to distribute playtime fun math with no basis in…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2507.14916/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.EP</category></item></channel></rss>
