LLMs are Bayesian, In Expectation, Not in Realization · HackerPapers discussions

LLMs are Bayesian, In Expectation, Not in Realization — mentioned by rishabhaiover

Mon, 09 Mar 2026 12:38:51 GMT

Damn, the research moves fast. I was wrong again: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.11768

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

LLMs are Bayesian, In Expectation, Not in Realization — mentioned by spindump8930

Tue, 09 Sep 2025 14:04:12 GMT

This topic is interesting, but the repo and paper have a lot of inconsistencies that make me think this work is hiding behind lots of dense notation and language. For one, the repo states: > This implementation follows the framework from the paper “Compression Failure in LLMs: Bayesian in Expectation, Not in Realization” (NeurIPS 2024 preprint) and related EDFL/ISR/B2T methodology. There doesn't seem to be a paper by that title, preprint or actual neurips publication. There is https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.11768, with a different title, and contains lots of inconsistencies with regards to the…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

LLMs are Bayesian, In Expectation, Not in Realization — mentioned by fiduciarytemp

Tue, 09 Sep 2025 12:37:03 GMT

Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.11768

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

LLMs are Bayesian, In Expectation, Not in Realization — HN submission

Thu, 24 Jul 2025 09:39:43 GMT

LLMs are Bayesian, in Expectation, not in Realization

2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.