<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>When Chain of Thought is Necessary, Language Models Struggle to Evade Monitors · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2507.05246/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2507.05246/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>When Chain of Thought is Necessary, Language Models Struggle to Evade Monitors — mentioned by flyingpumba</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49366375</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2507.05246:49366375</guid><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 19:55:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;First author here, surprised to see the paper in HN! :) When doing the paper we noticed that models are very good at generating post-hoc plausible CoT, which to me knowledge can happen quite often with relatively easy tasks. You might be interested in reading this other paper that came out after ours: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.05246&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2507.05246/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item></channel></rss>
