<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Impact of LLM-Assistants on Software Developer Productivity: A Systematic Review and Mapping Study · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2507.03156/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2507.03156/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Impact of LLM-Assistants on Software Developer Productivity: A Systematic Review and Mapping Study — mentioned by wahnfrieden</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45052926</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2507.03156:45052926</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 14:52:22 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Why are you quick to call it settled and scientifically concluded on the strength of a single study? That’s incredible confidence There is this paper that surveys results of 37 studies and reaches a different conclusion: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.03156 &amp;gt; Our analysis reveals that LLM-assistants offer both considerable benefits and critical risks. Commonly reported gains include minimized code search, accelerated development, and the automation of trivial and repetitive tasks. However, studies also highlight concerns around cognitive offloading, reduced team collaboration, and inconsistent…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2507.03156/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SE</category></item></channel></rss>
