<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Strategic Intelligence in Large Language Models: Evidence from evolutionary Game Theory · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2507.02618/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2507.02618/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Strategic Intelligence in Large Language Models: Evidence from evolutionary Game Theory — mentioned by code_biologist</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49365795</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2507.02618:49365795</guid><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 19:02:56 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The personality of the underlying model persists even if you&amp;#x27;re able to alter surface tone enough for your needs. An observation from a year ago: people on AI text RPG subreddits saying they had a lot of difficulty with Gemini role playing ambiguous characters and that almost always the characters would betray them, or misread the human role player&amp;#x27;s motives as negative. Someone pointed out this paper [1] that showed significant differences between the different LLMs strategic behavior playing iterated prisoner&amp;#x27;s dilemma where Gemini had exactly that behavior, and speculatively that…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2507.02618/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>Strategic Intelligence in Large Language Models: Evidence from evolutionary Game Theory — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44563008</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2507.02618:44563008</guid><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2025 17:41:39 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Strategic Intelligence in LLMs: Evidence from Evolutionary Game Theory&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2507.02618/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>Strategic Intelligence in Large Language Models: Evidence from evolutionary Game Theory — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44532482</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2507.02618:44532482</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2025 14:22:12 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Strategic Intelligence in Large Language Models&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2507.02618/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>Strategic Intelligence in Large Language Models: Evidence from evolutionary Game Theory — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44497753</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2507.02618:44497753</guid><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 07:03:18 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Strategic Intelligence in Large Language Models: Evidence from Evolutionary GT&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2507.02618/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item></channel></rss>
