<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Comparative Analysis of the Code Generated by Popular Large Language Models (LLMs) for MISRA C++ Compliance · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2506.23535/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2506.23535/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Comparative Analysis of the Code Generated by Popular Large Language Models (LLMs) for MISRA C++ Compliance — mentioned by photochemsyn</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48490250</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2506.23535:48490250</guid><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 13:43:14 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s worth looking at sectors where LLM code generation hasn’t been very visible, such as certification-accredited flight-control, braking, train-control, medical, or nuclear-control source code involving real-time embedded operating systems. This sector relies on assurance: deterministic scheduling requirements, detailed commit traceability, tool qualification, configuration management, independent verification, etc. Since this is an area where failure can lead not to Instagram accounts getting hacked, but planes falling out of the sky and nuclear reactors spewing radioactive elements, it’s…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2506.23535/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SE</category></item></channel></rss>
