<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Continuous operation of a coherent 3,000-qubit system · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2506.20660/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2506.20660/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Continuous operation of a coherent 3,000-qubit system — mentioned by adrian_b</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45516191</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2506.20660:45516191</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 13:49:51 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Room temperature&amp;quot; here just means that the whole device is not inside a cryostat, like for superconducting devices, which is indeed what matters for reducing cost and power consumption. The actual temperature of the lattice of neutral atoms held in vacuum with lasers is very low, i.e. the kinetic energy of these atoms is very low, otherwise they would escape the lattice. When the lattice of neutral atoms is created, the atoms are cooled with dedicated lasers, distinct from those that control the positions of the atoms. While eliminating the external cooling is nice, the volume, cost and…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2506.20660/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
