<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Universal pre-training by iterated random computation · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2506.20057/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2506.20057/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Universal pre-training by iterated random computation — mentioned by benob</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47439961</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2506.20057:47439961</guid><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 14:19:35 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Reminds me of &amp;quot;Universal pre-training by iterated random computation&amp;quot; https://arxiv.org/pdf/2506.20057, with bit less formal approach. I wonder if there is a closed-form solution for those kinds of initialization methods (call them pre-training if you wish). A solution that would allow attention heads to detect a variety of diverse patterns, yet more structured than random init.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2506.20057/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Universal pre-training by iterated random computation — mentioned by ACCount37</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45510911</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2506.20057:45510911</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 01:09:28 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The brain implements some kind of fairly general learning algorithm, clearly. There&amp;#x27;s too little data in the DNA to wire up 90 billion neurons the way we can just paste 90 billion weights into a GPU over a fiber optic strand. But there&amp;#x27;s a lot of innate scaffolding that actually makes the brain learn the way it does. Things like bouba and kiki, instincts, all the innate little quirks and biases - they add up to something very important. For example, we know from neuroscience that humans implement something not unlike curriculum learning - and a more elaborate version of it than what we use…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2506.20057/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Universal pre-training by iterated random computation — mentioned by benob</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45124800</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2506.20057:45124800</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 07:57:59 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Stop thinking about text being the data. There are so many other sources, even some that you can generate. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2506.20057&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2506.20057/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Universal pre-training by iterated random computation — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44409555</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2506.20057:44409555</guid><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2025 01:12:32 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Universal pre-training by iterated random computation&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;37 points; 6 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2506.20057/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
