<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Old problem revisited: Which equilateral convex polygons tile the plane? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2506.18473/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2506.18473/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Old problem revisited: Which equilateral convex polygons tile the plane? — mentioned by gsf_emergency_4</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45878022</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2506.18473:45878022</guid><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 17:05:11 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Gyromorphs seem to be Fourier transforms of quasicrystals.. if that makes them less mysterious [fig 2a] panels show near-perfect agreement between the real (resp. reciprocal) features of gyromorphs and the reciprocal (resp. real) features of quasicrystals. https://arxiv.org/html/2410.09023v1 Another paper of the week on experimentally discovering quasicrystals (&amp;amp; now, also gyromorphs https://arxiv.org/html/2506.18473v2&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2506.18473/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.MG</category></item></channel></rss>
