<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>ML-Master: Towards AI-for-AI via Integration of Exploration and Reasoning · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2506.16499/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2506.16499/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>ML-Master: Towards AI-for-AI via Integration of Exploration and Reasoning — mentioned by pplonski86</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46300531</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2506.16499:46300531</guid><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 10:58:39 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This is amazing. Porting library from one language to one language are easy for LLMs, LLMs are tired-less and aware of coding syntax very well. What I like in machine learning benchmarks is that agents develop and test many solutions, and this search process is very human-alike. Yesterday, I was looking into MLE-Bench for benchamrking coding Agents on machine learning tasks from Kaggle https://github.com/openai/mle-bench There are many projects that provide agents which performance is simply incredible, they can solve several Kaggle competitions under 24 hours and be on medal place. I think…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2506.16499/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item></channel></rss>
