HackerPapers

arXiv:2506.06832cs.AI

Cross-Entropy Games for Language Models: From Implicit Knowledge to General Capability Measures

Clément Hongler, Andrew Emil

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) define probability measures on text. By considering the implicit knowledge question of what it means for an LLM to know such a measure and what it entails algorithmically, we are naturally led to formulate a series of tasks that go beyond generative sampling, involving forms of summarization, counterfactual thinking, anomaly detection, originality search, reverse prompting, debating, creative solving, etc. These tasks can be formulated as games based on LLM measures, which we call Cross-Entropy (Xent) Games. Xent Games can be single-player or multi-player. They involve cross-entropy scores and cross-entropy constraints, and can be expressed as simple computational graphs and programs. We show the Xent Game space is large enough to contain a wealth of interesting examples, while being constructible from basic game-theoretic consistency axioms. We then discuss how the Xent Game space can be used to measure the abilities of LLMs. This leads to the construction of Xent Game measures: finite families of Xent Games that can be used as capability benchmarks, built from a given scope, by extracting a covering measure. To address the unbounded scope problem associated with the challenge of measuring general abilities, we propose to explore the space of Xent Games in a coherent fashion, using ideas inspired by evolutionary dynamics.

arXiv comments
42 pages, 16 figures
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.AIArtificial Intelligence cs.CLComputation and Language cs.GTComputer Science and Game Theory cs.ITInformation Theory cs.NENeural and Evolutionary Computing

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Aug 2025 to Aug 2025.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • > It's basically always guessing / confabulating / hallucinating if you ask it an introspective question like that. You're absolutely right! This is the basis of this recent paper https://www.arxiv.org/abs/2506.06832

      upperhalfplaneView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.