<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Cartridges: Lightweight and general-purpose long context representations via self-study · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2506.06266/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2506.06266/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Cartridges: Lightweight and general-purpose long context representations via self-study — mentioned by jxmorris12</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45659842</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2506.06266:45659842</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2025 18:41:24 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#x27;s great that people are starting to take continual learning seriously, and it seems like Jessy has been thinking about LLMs and continual learning longer than almost anyone. I especially like this taxonomy &amp;gt; I think of continual learning as two subproblems: &amp;gt; Generalization: given a piece of data (user feedback, a piece of experience, etc.), what update should we do to learn the “important bits” from that data? &amp;gt; Forgetting/Integration: given a piece of data, how do we integrate it with what we already know? My personal feeling is that generalization is a data issue: given a datapoint x…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2506.06266/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>Cartridges: Lightweight and general-purpose long context representations via self-study — mentioned by yorwba</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44754498</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2506.06266:44754498</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 09:05:10 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; In theory today, I should be able to process &amp;lt;long quote from document&amp;gt; &amp;lt;specific query&amp;gt; and just stop after the long document and save the KV cache right? People do this, it&amp;#x27;s called prefix caching. There&amp;#x27;s also https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06266 where they compress the context down to a smaller representation they call a &amp;quot;cartridge,&amp;quot; and composing cartridges from different contexts seems to work reasonably well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2506.06266/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>Cartridges: Lightweight and general-purpose long context representations via self-study — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44390737</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2506.06266:44390737</guid><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 20:01:09 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Cartridges: Lightweight long context representations via self-study&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2506.06266/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
