<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>FlashMoE: Fast Distributed MoE in a Single Kernel · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2506.04667/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2506.04667/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>FlashMoE: Fast Distributed MoE in a Single Kernel — mentioned by bytepoet</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44322313</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2506.04667:44322313</guid><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2025 20:36:31 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This is very cool. I enjoyed going through the writeup and GitHub README. I was wondering if these same optimizations can be brought to bear on training as well, rather than only inference. I guess the challenge here is fusing backward computations with gradient communication. I also saw that this currently does not handle dynamic workloads such as MoE. I recently came across this paper that does exactly this: FlashDMoE: Fast Distributed MoE in a Single Kernel - https://arxiv.org/pdf/2506.04667&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2506.04667/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DC</category></item></channel></rss>
