HackerPapers

arXiv:2506.04168cs.LG

Horizon Reduction Makes RL Scalable

Seohong Park, Kevin Frans, Deepinder Mann, Benjamin Eysenbach, Aviral Kumar, Sergey Levine

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

In this work, we study the scalability of offline reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms. In principle, a truly scalable offline RL algorithm should be able to solve any given problem, regardless of its complexity, given sufficient data, compute, and model capacity. We investigate if and how current offline RL algorithms match up to this promise on diverse, challenging, previously unsolved tasks, using datasets up to 1000x larger than typical offline RL datasets. We observe that despite scaling up data, many existing offline RL algorithms exhibit poor scaling behavior, saturating well below the maximum performance. We hypothesize that the horizon is the main cause behind the poor scaling of offline RL. We empirically verify this hypothesis through several analysis experiments, showing that long horizons indeed present a fundamental barrier to scaling up offline RL. We then show that various horizon reduction techniques substantially enhance scalability on challenging tasks. Based on our insights, we also introduce a minimal yet scalable method named SHARSA that effectively reduces the horizon. SHARSA achieves the best asymptotic performance and scaling behavior among our evaluation methods, showing that explicitly reducing the horizon unlocks the scalability of offline RL. Code: https://github.com/seohongpark/horizon-reduction

arXiv comments
NeurIPS 2025
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.LGMachine Learning cs.AIArtificial Intelligence

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Jun 2025 to Jun 2025.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

  1. Q-learning is not yet scalable 1 comment
    • TFP: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.04168 The DT citation [10] is used on a single line, in a paragraph listing prior work, as an "and more". Another paper that uses DTs [53] is also cited in a similar way. The authors do not test or discuss DTs. > hardness of the credit assignment…

      isaacimagineView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.