<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Writing-Zero: Bridge the Gap Between Non-verifiable Tasks and Verifiable Rewards · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2506.00103/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2506.00103/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Writing-Zero: Bridge the Gap Between Non-verifiable Tasks and Verifiable Rewards — mentioned by ag8</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45279592</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2506.00103:45279592</guid><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 18:31:36 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#x27;s for any task that has an &amp;quot;eval&amp;quot;, which is often verifiable tasks or ones that can be judged by LLMs (e.g. see [0]). There&amp;#x27;s also been recent work such as BRPO [1] and similar approaches to make more and more &amp;quot;non-verifiable&amp;quot; tasks have verifiable rewards! [0]: https://runrl.com/blog/funniest-joke [1]: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.00103&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2506.00103/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
