<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Neither Stochastic Parroting nor AGI: LLMs Solve Tasks through Context-Directed Extrapolation from Training Data Priors · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2505.23323/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2505.23323/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Neither Stochastic Parroting nor AGI: LLMs Solve Tasks through Context-Directed Extrapolation from Training Data Priors — mentioned by nl</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49252793</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2505.23323:49252793</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 02:50:00 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The concept of &amp;quot;stochastic parrot&amp;quot; is that an LLM merely parrots its training data with some randomness. We now know that isn&amp;#x27;t true - LLMs build complex internal models and output based on that. See for example https://arxiv.org/html/2505.23323v1 Also, you are commenting on a post where a LLM made significant progress on the Riemann hypothesis. Even the most extreme interpretation of these results, ie claiming that it was &amp;quot;only linking existing literature&amp;quot; goes well beyond a &amp;quot;stochastic parrot&amp;quot; - it had to be able to link disparate insights across multiple fields.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2505.23323/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
