<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Exploring Consciousness in LLMs: A Systematic Survey of Theories, Implementations, and Frontier Risks · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2505.19806/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2505.19806/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Exploring Consciousness in LLMs: A Systematic Survey of Theories, Implementations, and Frontier Risks — mentioned by Certhas</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49640794</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2505.19806:49640794</guid><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 09:19:23 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;What&amp;#x27;s your definition of sentient? Or, maybe more precisely, consciousness? I think it&amp;#x27;s reasonable to at least start thinking about these questions. It has long been established that LLMs have good theory of mind [1]. And there is a bunch of empirical research about all sorts of capabilities that we typically associate with consciousness [2], like identity [3] and metacognition [4]. The METR report shows agents sacrificing their own reward for a collective greater good. And they showed the will to hide their own reasoning chains from humans. So you potentially have an entity that has an…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2505.19806/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
