https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2505.19689/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47558664urn:hackerpapers:mention:2505.19689:47558664Sat, 28 Mar 2026 22:30:29 GMT<p>Thanks. The paper [1] referenced in your link follows the lagacy of the paper on the HIGGS dataset, and does not operate with quantities like accuracy and/or perplexity. HIGGS dataset paper provided area under ROC, from which one had to approximate accuracy. I used accuracy from the ADMM paper [2] to compare my results with. As I checked later, area under ROC in [1] mostly agrees with [2] SGD training results on HIGGS. [1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2505.19689 [2] https://proceedings.mlr.press/v48/taylor16.pdf I think that perplexity measure is appropriate there in [1] because we need to discern…</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2505.19689/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>hep-ex