HackerPapers

arXiv:2505.13004cs.CL

EffiBench-X: A Multi-Language Benchmark for Measuring Efficiency of LLM-Generated Code

Yuhao Qing, Boyu Zhu, Mingzhe Du, Zhijiang Guo, Terry Yue Zhuo, Qianru Zhang, Jie M. Zhang, Heming Cui, Siu-Ming Yiu, Dong Huang, See-Kiong Ng, Luu Anh Tuan

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Existing code generation benchmarks primarily evaluate functional correctness, with limited focus on code efficiency and often restricted to a single language like Python. To address this gap, we introduce EffiBench-X, the first multi-language benchmark designed to measure the efficiency of LLM-generated code. EffiBench-X supports Python, C++, Java, JavaScript, Ruby, and Golang. It comprises competitive programming tasks with human-expert solutions as efficiency baselines. Evaluating state-of-the-art LLMs on EffiBench-X reveals that while models generate functionally correct code, they consistently underperform human experts in efficiency. Even the most efficient LLM-generated solutions (Qwen3-32B) achieve only around \textbf{62\%} of human efficiency on average, with significant language-specific variations. LLMs show better efficiency in Python, Ruby, and JavaScript than in Java, C++, and Golang. For instance, DeepSeek-R1's Python code is significantly more efficient than its Java code. These results highlight the critical need for research into LLM optimization techniques to improve code efficiency across diverse languages. The dataset and evaluation infrastructure are submitted and available at https://github.com/EffiBench/EffiBench-X.git and https://huggingface.co/datasets/EffiBench/effibench-x.

arXiv comments
NeurIPS 2025 DB Track
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CLComputation and Language

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Jul 2026 to Jul 2026.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • Do you have citations? Everything I’ve read have said they have an overwhelming bias to Python; eg https://arxiv.org/html/2503.17181v1 and https://arxiv.org/html/2505.13004v1

      seanmcdirmidView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.