Can quantum gravity be both consistent and complete? — mentioned by nyrikki

Sat, 28 Jun 2025 19:25:33 GMT

To try and help people digging into this, the following helped me. Two lenses for trying to understand this are potentially Chastain's limits on output of a lisp program being more complex than the program itself [1] or Markov's proof that you can't classify manifolds in d>= 4. If you try the latter and need/want to figure out how the Russian school is so different this is helpful [2] IMHO the former gives an intuition why, and the latter explains why IMHO. In ZFC, C actually ends up implying PEM, which is why using constructionism as a form of reverse math helped it click for me . This is…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Can quantum gravity be both consistent and complete? — HN submission

Sat, 24 May 2025 14:13:17 GMT

Quantum gravity cannot be both consistent and complete

3 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

Can quantum gravity be both consistent and complete? · HackerPapers discussions

Can quantum gravity be both consistent and complete? — mentioned by nyrikki

Can quantum gravity be both consistent and complete? — HN submission