<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>$XX^{t}$ Can Be Faster · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2505.09814/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2505.09814/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>$XX^{t}$ Can Be Faster — mentioned by TimorousBestie</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48964954</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2505.09814:48964954</guid><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 04:24:49 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;If you’re interested, I found https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.09814v1 to beat Strassen for medium-sized and larger covariance matrices. YMMV of course. Takes a little adjustment for XX^H but it’s not so bad.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2505.09814/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DS</category></item><item><title>$XX^{t}$ Can Be Faster — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44006824</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2505.09814:44006824</guid><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 15:45:30 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;X X^t can be faster&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;201 points; 60 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2505.09814/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DS</category></item></channel></rss>
