arXiv:2505.09598cs.CY
How Hungry is AI? Benchmarking Energy, Water, and Carbon Footprint of LLM Inference
Abstract
This paper introduces an infrastructure-aware benchmarking framework for quantifying the environmental footprint of LLM inference across 30 state-of-the-art models in commercial datacenters. The framework combines public API performance data with company-specific environmental multipliers and statistical inference of hardware configurations. We additionally utilize cross-efficiency Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to rank models by performance relative to environmental cost and provide a dynamically updated dashboard that visualizes model-level energy, water, and carbon metrics. Results show the most energy-intensive models exceed 29 Wh per long prompt, over 65 times the most efficient systems. Even a 0.42 Wh short query, when scaled to 700M queries/day, aggregates to annual electricity comparable to 35{,}000 U.S. homes, evaporative freshwater equal to the annual drinking needs of 1.2M people, and carbon emissions requiring a Chicago-sized forest to offset. These findings highlight a growing paradox: as AI becomes cheaper and faster, global adoption drives disproportionate resource consumption. Our methodology offers a standardized, empirically grounded basis for sustainability benchmarking and accountability in AI deployment.
Page 38 has an interesting comparison saying a session of 8 "medium length" messages uses roughly 10Wh, the equivalent of ~2 phone charges. The data dashboard[1] I think is defining medium length as 1000 tokens in, 1000 tokens out. And the page before suggests GPT-5 mini…
big_toastView on HNParent context