HackerPapers

arXiv:2505.09598cs.CY

How Hungry is AI? Benchmarking Energy, Water, and Carbon Footprint of LLM Inference

Nidhal Jegham, Marwan Abdelatti, Chan Young Koh, Lassad Elmoubarki, Abdeltawab Hendawi

Abstract

This paper introduces an infrastructure-aware benchmarking framework for quantifying the environmental footprint of LLM inference across 30 state-of-the-art models in commercial datacenters. The framework combines public API performance data with company-specific environmental multipliers and statistical inference of hardware configurations. We additionally utilize cross-efficiency Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to rank models by performance relative to environmental cost and provide a dynamically updated dashboard that visualizes model-level energy, water, and carbon metrics. Results show the most energy-intensive models exceed 29 Wh per long prompt, over 65 times the most efficient systems. Even a 0.42 Wh short query, when scaled to 700M queries/day, aggregates to annual electricity comparable to 35{,}000 U.S. homes, evaporative freshwater equal to the annual drinking needs of 1.2M people, and carbon emissions requiring a Chicago-sized forest to offset. These findings highlight a growing paradox: as AI becomes cheaper and faster, global adoption drives disproportionate resource consumption. Our methodology offers a standardized, empirically grounded basis for sustainability benchmarking and accountability in AI deployment.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CYComputers and Society cs.AIArtificial Intelligence

On Hacker News

Linked by 3 identifiable commenters in 3 comments across 3 threads, from Aug 2025 to Apr 2026. Found in 1 HN submission from Aug 2025 to Aug 2025. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments3 threads

  1. Stanford HAI Index Report 2026 1 comment
    • Page 38 has an interesting comparison saying a session of 8 "medium length" messages uses roughly 10Wh, the equivalent of ~2 phone charges. The data dashboard[1] I think is defining medium length as 1000 tokens in, 1000 tokens out. And the page before suggests GPT-5 mini…

      big_toastView on HNParent context

    • One random preprint I found (https://arxiv.org/html/2505.09598v2) estimates inference is 90% of the total energy usage. From some googling around, everything seems to agree that inference dominates (or is at least comparable to) training on the large commonly-used models. I was…

      cillian64View on HNParent context

    • Says "medium" is 1,000-token. If I assume that takes 50 seconds, 40 Wh / 50 s = 2880 watts Seems a bit much? Even if I assume 1/3rd is the amortised result of the training runs and 1/6th is the cooling system, that only takes me down to the power draw of 2.4 times the H200s'…

      ben_wView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.