https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2505.05896/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44025171urn:hackerpapers:submission:2505.05896:44025171Sun, 18 May 2025 23:44:28 GMT<p>Consequences of the Moosbauer-Poole Algorithms</p><p></p><p>1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. <a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2505.05896/">Paper and source history</a>. A submission is not an endorsement.</p>cs.SChttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43988062urn:hackerpapers:submission:2505.05896:43988062Wed, 14 May 2025 18:59:44 GMT<p>Consequences of the Moosbauer-Poole Algorithms</p><p></p><p>1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. <a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2505.05896/">Paper and source history</a>. A submission is not an endorsement.</p>cs.SChttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43986280urn:hackerpapers:mention:2505.05896:43986280Wed, 14 May 2025 16:15:37 GMT<p>Interestingly, they improved matrix multiplication and there was a paper on Arxiv a few days ago [1] that also improved matrix multiplication and the only case common to both is &lt;4,5,6&gt; (multiplying 4x5 matrix with 5x6 matrix) and they both improved it from 93 to 90. [1]: https://arxiv.org/html/2505.05896v1</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2505.05896/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>cs.SC