<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Impact of Early Massive Galaxy Formation on the Cosmic Microwave Background · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2505.04687/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2505.04687/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Impact of Early Massive Galaxy Formation on the Cosmic Microwave Background — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44427315</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2505.04687:44427315</guid><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 20:10:31 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The Impact of Early Galaxy Formation on the Cosmic Microwave Background&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;6 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2505.04687/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.GA</category></item><item><title>The Impact of Early Massive Galaxy Formation on the Cosmic Microwave Background — mentioned by echelon</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44251975</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2505.04687:44251975</guid><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2025 21:24:33 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I have immense respect for astrophysicists, but the data we&amp;#x27;re dealing with is extremely far away and relies on a lot of interlocking assumptions. I stumbled upon this paper [1, 2] last night that challenges the CMB, and thus the underpinning of much of our understanding about the age and evolution of the universe. As a layperson, I don&amp;#x27;t know the impact factor of the &amp;quot;Nuclear Physics B&amp;quot; journal - if this is just junk or if this is a claim that will pan out. My point is that it feels like we&amp;#x27;re building on a lot of observations that are all super indirect. I know I&amp;#x27;m just a layperson, but…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2505.04687/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.GA</category></item></channel></rss>
