<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Position: AI Competitions Provide the Gold Standard for Empirical Rigor in GenAI Evaluation · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2505.00612/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2505.00612/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Position: AI Competitions Provide the Gold Standard for Empirical Rigor in GenAI Evaluation — mentioned by meganrisdal</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44655535</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2505.00612:44655535</guid><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 03:41:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;We love what Chatbot Arena is doing to innovate on evaluation paradigms. The challenge of evaluating GenAI warrants diverse approaches. What we&amp;#x27;re excited to do is: 1) give anyone access to infra to make evaluation more accessible to more developers and researchers; 2) drive more novel, diverse evals. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.00612v2&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2505.00612/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item></channel></rss>
