<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>ReCraft: Self-Contained Split, Merge, and Membership Change of Raft Protocol · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2504.14802/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2504.14802/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>ReCraft: Self-Contained Split, Merge, and Membership Change of Raft Protocol — mentioned by ingloriousB</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44932209</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2504.14802:44932209</guid><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2025 15:15:03 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;:) I&amp;#x27;m only using &amp;quot;seem&amp;quot; to indicate the limits of my knowledge. I was just hoping someone would chime in with a link to stronger/formal proof for VSR. Are you aware of any? So, yes, to my limited knowledge, I&amp;#x27;ve not found any existing formal proofs for VSR. The 2012 VSR revisited clearly labels their arguments informal; in section 8: &amp;quot;In this section we provide an informal discussion of the correctness of the protocol.&amp;quot; I&amp;#x27;d be delighted to learn of any formal / machine checked proofs of VSR ; equivalent to the Verdi project for Raft. These are elaborate and subtle protocols, easy to get…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2504.14802/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DC</category></item></channel></rss>
