<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>How new data permeates LLM knowledge and how to dilute it · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2504.09522/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2504.09522/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>How new data permeates LLM knowledge and how to dilute it — mentioned by ijk</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44152733</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2504.09522:44152733</guid><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2025 18:11:48 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Depends on the definition of &amp;quot;knowledge&amp;quot;; there&amp;#x27;s a lot of factors that go into it. Some of the common approaches are continued/continual pretraining and model editing (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2502.12598). * Models are bad at learning that A=B implies B=A, let alone more complicated relations; augmenting the dataset with multiple examples with different phrasing/perspectives is important (https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.00213). The frequency that a relation occurs in the dataset affects the results (https://arxiv.org/html/2504.09597v2). * You have to be able to balance preserving existing knowledge…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2504.09522/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
