HackerPapers

arXiv:2504.08818cs.LG

From Tokenizer Bias to Backbone Capability: A Controlled Study of LLMs for Time Series Forecasting

Xinyu Zhang, Shanshan Feng, Xutao Li, Kenghong Lin, Fan Li, Pengfei Jia

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Using pre-trained large language models (LLMs) as a backbone for time series prediction has recently attracted growing research interest. Existing approaches typically split time series into patches, map them to the token space of LLMs via a Tokenizer, process the tokens through a frozen or fine-tuned LLM backbone, and then reconstruct numerical forecasts using a Detokenizer. However, the actual effectiveness of LLMs for time series forecasting remains under debate. We observe that when trained and evaluated on small datasets, these Tokenizer-Detokenizer pairs often overfit to the specific data distribution, thereby masking the intrinsic predictive capability of the LLM backbone. To investigate the inherent potential of LLMs in this context, we design three models with identical architectures but distinct pre-training strategies. By leveraging large-scale pre-training, we obtain more unbiased Tokenizer-Detokenizer pairs that are seamlessly integrated with the LLM backbone. Through controlled experiments, we evaluate the zero-shot and few-shot forecasting performance of the LLM, offering insights into its true capabilities. Our extensive experiments reveal that, although the LLM backbone shows some promise, its performance remains limited and does not consistently surpass that of models specifically trained on large-scale time series data. Our source code is publicly available in the repository: https://github.com/SiriZhang45/LLM4TS.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.LGMachine Learning cs.AIArtificial Intelligence

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from Apr 2025 to Apr 2025. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.