<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Quantum-assured magnetic navigation achieves positioning accuracy better than a strategic-grade INS in airborne and ground-based field trials · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2504.08167/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2504.08167/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Quantum-assured magnetic navigation achieves positioning accuracy better than a strategic-grade INS in airborne and ground-based field trials — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43760816</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2504.08167:43760816</guid><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 11:09:50 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Quantum-assured magnetic navigation with higher positioning accuracy than GPS&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;34 points; 9 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2504.08167/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Quantum-assured magnetic navigation achieves positioning accuracy better than a strategic-grade INS in airborne and ground-based field trials — mentioned by anenefan</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43728020</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2504.08167:43728020</guid><pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 13:42:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Quite interesting, to myself magnetic fields wouldn&amp;#x27;t seem all that accurate but then again it&amp;#x27;s known some animals can navigate back to the same spot each yearly nesting / migration. It did seem maybe as per the article and [1] [2] the concept was just a little bit too good to be true but [3] being military supports that they&amp;#x27;ve been working towards an additional perhaps more accurate system. [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.08167 [Submitted on 10 Apr 2025 - Quantum-assured magnetic navigation achieves positioning accuracy better than a strategic-grade INS in airborne and ground-based field…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2504.08167/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Quantum-assured magnetic navigation achieves positioning accuracy better than a strategic-grade INS in airborne and ground-based field trials — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43688822</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2504.08167:43688822</guid><pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 03:50:53 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Q-CTRL publishes GPS-denied quantum magnetic navigation flight trial results&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2504.08167/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
