HackerPapers

arXiv:2504.02808quant-ph

Quantum theory does not need complex numbers

Timothee Hoffreumon, Mischa P. Woods

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Quantum theory was radically different from the theories of nature which came before it. One key difference was its use of complex numbers. This opened a longstanding debate over whether quantum theory fundamentally requires complex numbers -- or if their use is merely a convenient choice. Until recently, this question was considered open. However, in a 2021 Nature article, a decisive argument was presented asserting that quantum theory needs complex numbers since real-number quantum theory is inconsistent with the postulates of quantum theory. In this work, we show that this conclusion was premature, and in actual fact, a real-number quantum theory is consistent with the postulates of quantum theory. Our theory retains key features such as representation locality (i.e. local physical operations are represented by local changes to the states). A direct consequence of our results is that quantum theory based on real or complex numbers are experimentally indistinguishable.

arXiv comments
7 + appendices
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
quant-phQuantum Physics

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Nov 2025 to Nov 2025. Found in 1 HN submission from Dec 2025 to Dec 2025. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • Yup, swapping the complex numbers with matrices that encode the same transformations: a + bi -> [a -b] [b a] Here is the paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.02808

      itishappyView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.