arXiv:2503.20986cs.CY
MAD Chairs: A new tool to evaluate AI
Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.
Abstract
This paper contributes a new way to evaluate AI. Much as one might evaluate a machine in terms of its performance at chess, this approach involves evaluating a machine in terms of its performance at a game called "MAD Chairs". At the time of writing, evaluation with this game exposed opportunities to improve Claude, Gemini, ChatGPT, Qwen and DeepSeek. Furthermore, this paper sets a stage for future innovation in game theory and AI safety by providing an example of success with non-standard approaches to each: studying a game beyond the scope of previous game theoretic tools and mitigating a serious AI safety risk in a way that requires neither determination of values nor their enforcement.
Claude Skills are going to be the end of all human mental labor, but in a good way. Eventually, we shall, as a human race working together, also figure out how to generalize this to all AI models, all robotics, and all human skills. My friend Christopher Santos-Lang wrote a…
anandvcView on HNParent context