HackerPapers

arXiv:2503.17354cs.AI

HCAST: Human-Calibrated Autonomy Software Tasks

David Rein, Joel Becker, Amy Deng, Seraphina Nix, Chris Canal, Daniel O'Connel, Pip Arnott, Ryan Bloom, Thomas Broadley, Katharyn Garcia, Brian Goodrich, Max Hasin, Sami Jawhar, Megan Kinniment, Thomas Kwa, Aron Lajko, Nate Rush, Lucas Jun Koba Sato, Sydney Von Arx, Ben West, Lawrence Chan, Elizabeth Barnes

Abstract

To understand and predict the societal impacts of highly autonomous AI systems, we need benchmarks with grounding, i.e., metrics that directly connect AI performance to real-world effects we care about. We present HCAST (Human-Calibrated Autonomy Software Tasks), a benchmark of 189 machine learning engineering, cybersecurity, software engineering, and general reasoning tasks. We collect 563 human baselines (totaling over 1500 hours) from people skilled in these domains, working under identical conditions as AI agents, which lets us estimate that HCAST tasks take humans between one minute and 8+ hours. Measuring the time tasks take for humans provides an intuitive metric for evaluating AI capabilities, helping answer the question "can an agent be trusted to complete a task that would take a human X hours?" We evaluate the success rates of AI agents built on frontier foundation models, and we find that current agents succeed 70-80% of the time on tasks that take humans less than one hour, and less than 20% of the time on tasks that take humans more than 4 hours.

arXiv comments
32 pages, 10 figures, 5 tables
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.AIArtificial Intelligence

On Hacker News

Linked by 2 identifiable commenters in 2 comments across 2 threads, from May 2026 to Jun 2026.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • > Lousy benchmark Make your own then. It can go on the pile with all the others that keep getting saturated too fast to be useful. > they explicitly focus on the easiest tasks to automate for AI (i.e. heavily cherry picked outcomes) and it seems that they don't bother to test…

      ben_wView on HNParent context

  1. The sigmoids won't save you 1 comment
    • The METR task set contains no tasks with a duration greater than 32 hours (conservatively eyeballed from Figure 3: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.17354 ), so any prediction that naively forecasts a longer time horizon is trivially incorrect. I guess that won't lead to a…

      yorwbaView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.