<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Monitoring Reasoning Models for Misbehavior and the Risks of Promoting Obfuscation · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2503.11926/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2503.11926/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Monitoring Reasoning Models for Misbehavior and the Risks of Promoting Obfuscation — mentioned by the8472</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44584963</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2503.11926:44584963</guid><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 17:42:55 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The core finding was already predicted[0], there have been previous papers[1], and kind of obvious considering RL systems have been specification-gaming for decades[2]. But yes, it&amp;#x27;s good to see broad agreement on it. [0] https://thezvi.substack.com/p/ai-68-remarkably-reasonable-re... [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.11926 [2] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/1/d/e/2PACX-1vRPiprOa...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2503.11926/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item></channel></rss>
