arXiv:2503.11901cs.DC
Story of Two GPUs: Characterizing the Resilience of Hopper H100 and Ampere A100 GPUs
Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.
Abstract
This study characterizes GPU resilience in Delta, a large-scale AI system that consists of 1,056 A100 and H100 GPUs, with over 1,300 petaflops of peak throughput. We used 2.5 years of operational data (11.7 million GPU hours) on GPU errors. Our major findings include: (i) H100 GPU memory resilience is worse than A100 GPU memory, with 3.2x lower per-GPU MTBE for memory errors, (ii) The GPU memory error-recovery mechanisms on H100 GPUs are insufficient to handle the increased memory capacity, (iii) H100 GPUs demonstrate significantly improved GPU hardware resilience over A100 GPUs with respect to critical hardware components, (iv) GPU errors on both A100 and H100 GPUs frequently result in job failures due to the lack of robust recovery mechanisms at the application level, and (v) We project the impact of GPU node availability on larger-scales and find that significant overprovisioning of 5% is necessary to handle GPU failures.
General question to people who might actually know. Is there anywhere that does anything like Backblaze's Hard Drive Failure Rates [1] for GPU Failure Rates in environments like data centers, high-performance computing, super-computers, mainframes? [1]…
araesView on HNParent context