HackerPapers

arXiv:2503.10518physics.hist-ph

Why the Brain Cannot Be a Digital Computer: History-Dependence and the Computational Limits of Consciousness

Andrew Knight

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

This paper presents a novel information-theoretic proof demonstrating that the human brain as currently understood cannot function as a classical digital computer. Through systematic quantification of distinguishable conscious states and their historical dependencies, we establish that the minimum information required to specify a conscious state exceeds the physical information capacity of the human brain by a significant factor. Our analysis calculates the bit-length requirements for representing consciously distinguishable sensory "stimulus frames" and demonstrates that consciousness exhibits mandatory temporal-historical dependencies that multiply these requirements beyond the brain's storage capabilities. This mathematical approach offers new insights into the fundamental limitations of computational models of consciousness and suggests that non-classical information processing mechanisms may be necessary to account for conscious experience.

arXiv comments
10 pages, 1 figure
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
physics.hist-phHistory and Philosophy of Physics cs.AIArtificial Intelligence q-bio.NCNeurons and Cognition

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from May 2026 to May 2026. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.